Public Private
Partnership in Education (PPPE) Strategy in Uganda
Enhancing Policy
Dialogue and Advocacy through Industry Sector Associations and Private
Professional Associations
Public
Private Partnership in Education (PPPE) is often defined as primarily a set of
institutional relationships between the Government and various actors in the
private sector. The Government of the Republic of Uganda seems to recognize the
importance of private sector participation in the delivery of education
services as critical. On this basis, Uganda National Association of Private
Schools and Institutions (UNAPSI) is proposing to private education
stakeholders in partnership with the Ministry of Education and Sports (MOES) to
forge ahead to formulate the Education PPP Strategy and Implementation
Guidelines, as a means of mobilizing resources and augmenting the limited
public resources with the private sector’s resources.
The
Education PPP Guidelines will provide a framework structured and managed by the
Public Private Partnership in Education (PPPE) Committee or PPPE Technical
Working Group PPPE/TWG and the Private Schools and Institutions Department of
the Ministry Education and Sports, Uganda.
One of the effective strategies is when sector industry associations, private
corporations and investors and operators engage in education through coalitions
working in partnership with government with the overall goal of enhancing
regulatory reform, policy, incentives and endorsement to shape basic education
that will in turn create a better workforce.
The
Government retains the core state functions, services and assets that are to
provide the services expected of the State. The PPPE Strategy and Guidelines will be informed by several other
national policy documents, development plans and international best practices.
These include:
§ National PPP
framework,
§ National Education
Policy Framework,
§ MOES Strategic
Plan, and
§ Public Private
Partnership in Education Discussion Papers,
§ National
Development Plan (NDP), and
§ MOES Roadmap.
§ Private Sector
Manifesto
§ International
Best Practices and Evidence-based practices for Private Schools Sector
Governance
The Public Private Partnership in
Education (PPPE) Strategy and Guidelines will set out its Vision, Mission,
Objectives, Rational and Principles that define parameters as a way to ensure
sound strategic intentions, focus needs and challenges of the education sector.
Institutional Setup and Responsibilities for the PPPE
Institutional
setup is to be designed to cover all the concerned stakeholders in such a way
that each handles the roles within its competency and within the context of the
prevailing laws. i.e
1.
Private Education Professionals Associations
2.
Private Education Industry Sector Associations
3.
Trade Industry Associations
4.
Corporate Companies
5.
Development Partners
6.
CSOs
7.
Private Vocational and Technical Associations
8.
Research Organizations
9.
Suppliers
10.
Etc
In
executing its functions, the PPPE will be supported by the PPPE Project
Steering Committee or PPPE/TWG, which will be composed of permanent members
representing the various functional departments of the Ministry, and relevant
bodies or associations representing the Private Sector, as well as ad hoc members
that may be appointed from time to time for specific purpose of their
expertise.
Until
such time that there is deep experience in the management of PPPE, there may be
a need for occasional hiring of specialized advisors and expertise such as
lawyers, financial analysts, financiers, economists, sociologists, business
people and education specialists to support the PPPE Unit in the development
and implementation of PPP programs.
As
far as possible, each private sector association should develop the necessary
in-house skills and structures to carry out its own duties. The most important aspect to
consider in determining capacity requirement is to recognize that it is crucial
for the PPPE Unit to have multiple skills, which include expertise in the areas
of education, private sector governance, finance and accountancy, business
development and economics, government relations and regulatory affairs and law
of contracts. Additionally, another important consideration in determining the capacity
requirement for E/PPP is to know what the key success factors are for PPP Units
in general.
The
E/PPP Strategy will be born out of the commitment of the MOES Private Schools
and Institutions department to deliver on its mandate “to oversee, provide and
regulate private and non-governmental sectors in the provision of education
services and ensuring equity, accessibility, affordability and sustainability”.
Despite its prevalence, private
delivery of education services and stakeholders are sometimes perceived as threats
(rather than complementary or agents of government programmes). The profit
motive is often viewed as incongruent with the perception of education as a
social rather than commercial good. Because of this, authorities may be reluctant
to recognize explicitly the role played by the private sector in their
legislation or in the education plans and strategies developed. Private sector
providers serving low-income communities are often not captured in national data,
as the incidence of non-registration among private providers, especially
small-scale, for-profit and NGO-type providers, is relatively high compared to
urban, large-scale private providers. Others choose to remain unregistered and
thus not under the purview of government, due to the existence of legal and
regulatory hurdles that may restrict their operations. This may raise issues
relating to quality, especially for poor communities where children
predominantly attend unregistered schools and have no legal or regulatory protection.
The Education/PPP Framework is
underpinned by the following assumptions:
1.
That there are limitations on the part of the private sector
in terms of its governance and managerial capabilities to deliver education
services at required standards;
2.
That private sector is well positioned in terms of its
financial, commercial and managerial sources to bring about significant and
sustainable improvements in the education sector;
3.
That there will be no transfer of ownership of assets, from
public to private sector;
4.
That the entry of the private sector into the partnership is
sufficiently profitable;
5.
That appropriate framework exists to ensure predictable and
consistent implementation and regulation of the Education/PPP strategy;
6.
That appropriate allocation of risks between the public and
the private operator is possible;
7.
That there is efficiency gain to be derived as a result of
the partnership;
8.
That there is lack of clarity among private education sector associations,
fragmentation, unnecessary collisions, overlaps, duplication and competition;
9.
That
there is complex school registration criteria and processes; inconsistent enforcement
of regulations, leading to corruption; overlapping jurisdictions; weak legal
frameworks;and funding restrictions for private schools restrict further
private sector engagement;
10. That there is increasing
dominance of private education sector which is underrepresented, fragmented,
uncoordinated and insufficiently regulated.
With
the Education PPP Strategy, the MOES will be passing the operational issues to
the private sector/operators through their respective associations, while
retaining and increasing its focus on core responsibilities of regulation,
supervision and provision of core services such as policies and compliances, in
line with directive of the National Education Policy. On the basis of this line
of argument, efficiency gain is obvious. However, this initiative has to be
accompanied by equally important improvements in various management processes
and systems of stakeholders on this program.
No comments:
Post a Comment